Site search provides quick access to publications on this site. Publications are also available through the publications link on the left menu.

  1.  Home
  2. Information for Councils
  3. Promoting Better Practice Review
Contact Print this page Reduce font size Increase font size

Local Government Reform Program – Promoting Better Practice Review

Text Box: challenges improvement innovation good governance 		challenges improvement innovation good governance

Contents

What is Local Government Reform – Promoting Better Practice?

Local Government Reform - Promoting Better Practice is a review process that is part of the local government reform program. The program aims to improve the viability and sustainability of councils. The process represents the second stage of the NSW Government’s program of reform for local government.

Objectives

Reviews can act as a ‘health check’, giving the council confidence about what is being done and helping to focus attention on key priorities. The process has a number of objectives:
  • to generate momentum for a culture of continuous improvement and greater compliance across local government
  • to provide an ‘early intervention’ option for councils experiencing operating problems
  • to promote good governance and ethical conduct principles
  • to identify and share innovation and good practice in local government
  • to enable the division to use review information to feed back into its work in identifying necessary legislative and policy work for the local government sector.

How does the division select councils for review?

Councils will be selected for review on the basis of, but not limited to, the following:
  • whether councils in the region or locality have been reviewed and if so, how many
  • where the council has requested a review
  • the council’s financial position
  • the council’s performance in key areas as identified in the comparative performance publication
  • the date of the last review, section 740 inquiry or section 430 investigation of the council
  • referral or request from another department branch or body such as the ICAC or the Ombudsman;
  • number and seriousness of complaints and allegations about significant performance issues
  • a direction from the Minister or Chief Executive, Local Government

Review program process

A review involves a review team closely evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of key aspects of council operations and giving feedback. This will involve assessing council’s overall strategic direction, checking compliance, examining appropriate practices and ensuring that council has frameworks in place to monitor its performance.

A review may focus on specific areas of council activities that have been identified as a result of an analysis of council’s information and data.

Councils are asked to complete a self-assessment of their strategic management and operating practices. An analysis of this will assist the review team to appropriately focus the review. The review team conducts a reality check as part of the on site review. It tests what the review team read, see or hear. The division endeavours to give the council about 4 weeks in which to respond to the self-assessment materials. The on site stage generally occurs a further 3 to 4 weeks after council’s response is received.

The council receives a report on the issues identified during the review. The report will include what is working well at council as well as challenges for improvement. The Division of Local Government monitors council’s actions in response to the report to ensure that the review recommendations are acted upon.

The Five Stages of a Review

PREPARING:

This involves council completing a strategic self-assessment and practice checklists, which we call the program tools. The strategic self-assessment examines the adequacy of council’s strategic focus. It asks council to explore what it is trying to achieve; how it delivers its priorities; what it has or has not achieved; and what it has learned and plans to do next.

The council practice checklist is a series of 5 checklists that relate to council’s assessment of its ability to meet minimum practice standards. The checklist covers the areas of Governance; Regulatory Functions; Asset and Financial Management; Community and Consultation; and Workforce Relations. Reviewers also request a range of key council documents including plans, policies, procedures and reports across a range of council operational areas. Click here to go to the program tools

ASSESSING:

The review team analyses performance data and local circumstances. The types of information considered by the reviewers before going on site includes; the demographics of the council area, community and social issues, development constraints or pressures, the types of activities council is involved in, council’s organisational structure and staffing, management plans and processes, comparative information, council’s financial position, seriousness and number of complaints and the results of council’s self-assessment. Reviewers also consult other relevant stakeholders including the NSW Ombudsman, the Independent Commission Against Corruption, the NSW Department of Planning and other relevant NSW Government Agencies and community stakeholders.

The information the reviewers collect and analyse before going on site will help decide where the reviewers spend their time while on site. The focus of the review may vary according to the nature of the council’s work and local circumstances. A good understanding of local circumstances may help to explain why a council manages its work in a particular way.

CHECKING:

Fieldwork provides the opportunity to gather valuable evidence to support the division’s analysis of council’s performance. Discussing these aspects with staff gives the reviewers an opportunity to “test” what they are seeing or finding.

During the review the reviewers conduct a range of activities such as: meeting with senior officers, talking with individual staff and councillors, observing council or committee meetings, following or auditing council processes and reviewing policies and procedures

ANALYSING:

As the review progresses, the review team develops and tests hypotheses or preliminary conclusions. Conclusions will be based on evidence – either what the reviewers have seen, discussed or drawn conclusions from data or documents. Conclusions will be based on more than someone simply telling the reviewer this is so – they should be supported by data, documents or other reports.

Conclusions will be based on an assessment of the scale of the problem (or better practice) – how prevalent is the problem? How great is the risk to the organisation? Giving examples assists to understand this. Our conclusions must be balanced, for example, giving a sense of the risk and scale of the practice, good or bad. It may be across the organisation or just isolated to one department or section, but could be a high risk concern for the council.

Conclusions will be based on themes that cut across individual functions in the organisation – while there may be issues that are specific to individual areas of council and these may need to be commented upon, the review team will be looking for themes that are common to a number of areas of council.

REPORTING:

The reviewers will conduct an exit interview with council’s General Manager and/or Mayor at the end of the on site visit. This should inform council of the emerging conclusions and areas likely to be the subject of comment in the report.

A draft report is prepared following the on site review and this is sent to council as a confidential draft for comment. Council’s comments are considered and the final report is prepared and issued to council, the Minister and the Chief Executive, Local Government. Council must table the report so that it becomes a public document. Click here to go to review reports

Council will be requested to draw up an action plan in response to the recommendations in the final report. The division monitors the implementation of the action plan. Click here to download a two page handout on the program.

Program Tools - Strategic Framework Assessment and Practice Checklists

How can my council use the Program Tools?

The division encourages all councils to use the program tools as a basis for self-assessment of their own operations and performance, and as a basis for identifying and responding to opportunities to improve results and services. It is vital to the sustainability of the sector to encourage and foster a culture of self-assessment and self-improvement.

Councils have a range of options in conducting a self-assessment using the program tools:

  • Use council’s internal auditor to manage the review process, with key senior managers completing the program tools. Using this approach, the internal auditor will report to the general manager and the council on the review findings.
  • Use a management consultant to oversee the review process and report to the general manager and the council
  • Request an adjoining or nearby council to conduct a peer review of council using the program tools
  • Develop a regional approach whereby a review team made up of staff drawn from regional councils undertakes reviews of all participating councils.

Councils undertaking self assessment are encouraged to report to their communities and the division on their findings and on the actions they propose to undertake to address issues identified in the review process.

Councils that participate in the process will inevitability identify areas where they need and/or want to improve on their current practices. There are numerous resources available to assist councils in this process.

  • Divisional Practice Notes and Guidelines
  • Publications issued by the Independent Commission Against Corruption, the NSW Ombudsman and the Audit Office of NSW.
  • Resources produced by the Local Government and Shires Associations and Local Government Managers Australia
  • Better practices current being used by other councils.

The review process has already identified numerous examples of some excellent practices. Details of these practices are included in the reports available on this website. Councils are encouraged to contact the councils concerned directly for further information on the better practices.

Promoting Better Practice Review Reports

Following completion, the division's review reports are tabled by the councils concerned and thereby become public documents. Below is a table of completed council reviews, with links to completed reports that have been tabled by the reviewed councils. This table will be updated periodically as reviews are completed and final reports are tabled by councils.

Council Report Issued
2012/13
Tamworth Regional Council 8 April 2013
Albury City Council 8 March 2013
Burwood Council 15 February 2013
Greater Taree City Council 21 January 2013
Liverpool City Council 10 January 2013
Upper Lachlan Shire Council 7 August 2012
2011/12
Uralla Shire Council 7 June 2012
Temora Shire Council 26 April 2012
Wingecarribee Shire Council 26 April 2012
Junee Shire Council 29 March 2012
Gloucester Shire Council 8 March 2012
Upper Hunter Shire Council 24 February 2012
Manly Council 23 December 2011
Port Stephens Council 14 November 2011
Hurstville City Council 13 October 2011
Coffs Harbour City Council 19 July 2011
2010/11
Blacktown City Council 22 June 2011
Gunnedah Shire Council 22 June 2011
Canterbury City Council 7 June 2011
Murrumbidgee Shire Council 15 February 2011
Midcoast County Council 8 February 2011
Woollahra Municipal Council 31 January 2011
Central Darling Shire Council 30 January 2011
Leeton Shire Council 24 January 2011
Cessnock City Council 17 December 2010
Wollondilly Shire Council 17 November 2010
Warrumbungle Shire Council 12 November 2010
2009/10
Palerang Council 30 April 2010
City of Canada Bay Council 30 April 2010
Ryde City Council 30 March 2010
Queanbeyan City Council 12 March 2010
Ku-ring-gai Shire Council 29 January 2010
Guyra Shire Council 29 January 2010
New England Strategic Alliance of Councils (NESAC) 21 January 2010
Brewarrina Shire Council 11 December 2009
Goulburn Mulwaree Council 17 November 2009
Pittwater Council 16 November 2009
Mid-Western Regional Council 4 November 2009
Griffith City Council 7 September 2009
2008/09
Liverpool Plains Shire Council 23 February 2009
Great Lakes Council 23 February 2009
Shoalhaven City Council 16 February 2009
Ashfield Municipal Council 12 December 2008
Lismore City Council 10 October 2008
Ballina Shire Council 10 October 2008
Wagga Wagga City Council 21 August 2008
Nambucca Shire Council 19 August 2008
Bombala Council 19 August 2008
2007/08
Kyogle Council 25 June 2008
Bellingen Shire Council 18 June 2008
Young Shire Council 11 April 2008
Tenterfield Shire Council 8 April 2008
Inverell Shire Council 8 April 2008
Deniliquin Council 8 April 2008
Forbes Shire Council 12 March 2008
Oberon Council 7 March 2008
Newcastle City Council 7 March 2008
Gwydir Shire Council 28 February 2008
Conargo Shire Council 28 February 2008
Snowy River Shire Council 18 December 2007
Weddin Shire Council 13 December 2007
Wellington Blayney Cabonne Strategic Alliance 6 December 2007
Parkes Shire Council 5 December 2007
Richmond Valley Council 5 October 2007
Canterbury City Council 28 September 2007
Baulkham Hills Shire Council 25 September 2007
Blayney Shire Council 19 September 2007
Hunters Hill Council 27 August 2007
Wellington Council 10 August 2007
Lithgow City Council 16 July 2007
Cabonne Shire Council 16 July 2007
Bankstown City Council 16 July 2007
Auburn Council 6 July 2007
2006/07
Lane Cove Municipal Council 29 June 2007
Coolamon Shire Council 7 June 2007
Bathurst Regional Council 16 May 2007
Penrith City Council 26 March 2007
Muswellbrook Shire Council 15 February 2007
Cessnock City Council 7 February 2007
Eurobodalla Shire Council 28 November 2006
Bega Valley Shire Council 28 November 2006
Bogan Shire Council 23 November 2006
Narrabri Shire Council 21 November 2006
Wollongong City Council 16 November 2006
Coonamble Shire Council 29 September 2006
Boorowa Council 27 September 2006
Byron Shire Council 26 September 2006
Shellharbour City Council 4 August 2006
Broken Hill City Council 26 July 2006
Harden Shire Council 19 July 2006
Kiama Municipal Council 18 July 2006
2005/06
Rockdale City Council 7 June 2006
Marrickville Council 10 April 2006
Armidale Dumaresq Council 5 April 2006
Port Macquarie Hastings Council 21 March 2006
Manly Municipal Council 8 March 2006
Kempsey Shire Council 14 February 2006
Tumbarumba Shire Council 16 January 2006
Tumut Shire Council 22 December 2005
Narromine Shire Council 16 December 2005
Dubbo City Council 16 December 2005
Gosford City Council 12 December 2005
Moree Plains Shire Council 16 November 2005
Mosman Municipal Council 11 November 2005
Maitland City Council 14 September 2005
Port Stephens Council 12 September 2005
Dungog Shire Council 5 September 2005
2004/05
Hornsby Shire Council 20 April 2005
Wakool Shire Council 30 March 2005
Berrigan Shire Council 8 March 2005
Murray Shire Council 28 February 2005
Wyong Shire Council 11 January 2005
Urana Shire Council 11 January 2005
Jerilderie Shire Council 11 January 2005
Lockhart Shire Council 25 November 2004
Campbelltown City Council 10 September 2004
   

Requesting a Promoting Better Practice Review

The division welcomes requests from councils to undertake a review of their council. The division asks that such requests be made in writing to the Chief Executive, Local Government. When requesting reviews, councils should indicate whether they have already completed the program tools. Where possible, the division will endeavour to accommodate the request in its program within 6 to 12 months of the request being made. Councils that have already completed a self-assessment using the program tools will be given priority in programming a departmental review.

Contact Information

For further information contact the Investigations and Review Branch of the Division of Local Government Telephone: 02 4428 4100
Email:dlg@dlg.nsw.gov.au
Mail: Locked Bag 3015 Nowra NSW 2541

Contact Print this page Reduce font size Increase font size